Friday, April 29, 2011

On the Spot!

So we had food trip with my girlfriends today...

What the heck?! its been more than a week since I haven't seen my girls. All I did was go to school in the afternoon, do my homework at night, eat, sleep, go to church, check my mail.. then loop. But today was a day to fill out tummies with so much food and laugh our asses off. From Ateneo to Harley's where we had early dinner, then off to NCCC where we spent time looking at some stuff then drove all the way to SM for the sale galore but instead of buying stuffs, we ended up buying food.

So I brought my DSLR with me today and had a chance to play around.
:) So here's some quick snapshots with my girls!


me, Atheena and Tina at Harley's :) Dinner at 6pm.

Fooling around. :) bunny ears!!

must love frozen yogurt!! i'll be on the go!

burp yum! :) done and done.


from full to empty.. stomach's happy now.




Thank you girls. Then again. :)

Issue no. 2: They rise as we continue to fall

Since I had worked on some bad issues regarding economics in the previous blog, let me point out that  its not all about the bad news. 

Asian-owned businesses grow sharply in US 


Agence France-Presse
First Posted 08:56:00 04/29/2011

Filed Under: business, Statistics

WASHINGTON—Businesses owned by AsianAmericans have grown at more than twice the national average, offering a boost to the United States economy, official figures said Thursday.
Releasing a survey taken twice each decade, the Census Bureau said that Asian Americans owned 1.5 million businesses in 2007, a rise of 40 percent from five years earlier. The national growth rate was 18 percent.
"Asian-owned businesses continued to be one of the strongest segments of our nation's economy," ThomasMesenbourg, the deputy director of the Census Bureau, said in a statement
The businesses generated more than $500 billion in sales in 2007 and employed some 2.8 million people, the Census Bureau said.
Of Asian-owned businesses, more than one-quarter were run by Chinese Americans. Businesses owned by Vietnamese Americans were among the fastest growing, increasing nearly 56 percent over the five-year period.
Businesses by most US minority groups have been growing strongly, with African American-owned firms soaring more than 60 percent between 2002 and 2007.
The United States is becoming increasingly diverse. The latest census found nearly 14.7 million Asian Americans, a rise of nearly half from a decade earlier. Only the US Hispanic population grew more quickly.

Source: http://business.inquirer.net/money/breakingnews/view/20110429-333585/Asian-owned-businesses-grow-sharply-in-US







Personal Reflection:


This article definitely made a good point to growing problems with regards to business and enterprise. The proof that anybody can still make it in the global market remains to push as to create a pragmatic difference in the lives of many people. In my own personal view, I am definitely in the game of economic challenge, although it is not as easy as it sounds and how these business grew in United States, still I believe that there is hope to spare for us here in the Philippines.

As for the present state of our market shares in our country, I have seen that the power of hardwork and perseverance can lead to an astounding goal of success. With the diversified level of intellect of Filipinos, I think that there is another way out of this poverty line. If other Asian countries are able to penetrate to the global market, there is also a great possibility for us (Filipinos) to actually break in. With respect to raw materials, we have great advantage than other nations. As I can see, there is a better chance for us to progress than other neighboring countries who actually import raw materials to make products. Our labor force is also abundant, we have skilled workers in most aspects of work loads which means that we can make our own product in our market and we can also export on our own. Philippine market is highly competitive but it is not as strong as other free markets across the world.

Major problem: As to the many interesting reasons on how our country can progress, I think that in the nature of government that we have now, the chance of growth and development is unlikely or close to undefined. The government are more particular with other things such as pork barrel than having to come up with better economic perspective. In lieu to this belief, I think that the government themselves hardly pass a plan for a larger and long term goal of success with economic issues. They are more concerned with road reconstructions (which is also important but it seems that it is not as paved as it should have been) or tourism (which is one major source of income) and sending other Filipinos abroad (OFWs who send remittances to their families which in return increases the ROI in banking). Isn't there any other projects that they can think of that can help businesses or good production for exports?

Then it hit me, poverty arouse from uncanny and selfish law makers who take tax monies and place them in their pockets. If they could have done some deals with other foreign nations to build other businesses and expand the investment world, lessen the terrorism, maybe we can be highly competitive now. If their share of interest is not only for themselves, maybe our country could be progressive now as we speak.

In the world of business, there is always a risk. The government should take a risk. Sitting pretty and making laws, passing bills isn't all the reason why these people are voted anyways, otherwise we could have sent lawyers instead of active people in both Senate and Congress.
Like I said earlier, it is not as easy as it seems. If progress can be achieved by Vietnamese, there is hope for us. If Chinese can turn the world upside down, why can't we? If Japan had not worked internally and cooperated, they could still be the ill-fated country once bombarded by Atomic bombs. If Philippines had peso-dollar exchange rate close to 1:1 in the earlier years, why can't it now?

Factors, factors. So many factors. But think about this: If people were to work hard, think outside of the box, grow from the mistakes made by the previous lawmakers, then maybe we can move mountains.

In the future. I remain. My faith remains.


-beth-



Thursday, April 28, 2011

trial page

http://hire-hackers.net/freehacking.php?hacker=doodles

Chapter 4 Notes

Hey guys..

here's where i uploaded the notes for Chapter 4.. in case you wanna get it. :)

and all the rest of the notes if you wanna get it.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/adduecon230/files/

please check.
Thanks much.

Saturday, April 16, 2011


true. Some people are just plain ungrateful with their life...
It is by far an eye opener for all of us to be thankful to everyone who comes into out life...

Today a TV personality died- AJ Perez...
God takes away our lives in an instant in his own time, not ours...
So, whatever and whoever we have now... let us take time to be thankful
and recognize their worth..

You never know, that person you love might be gone
tomorrow. :(

Econ Notes :)

Hi guys.

This just came.
Download speed is killing me.

Anyways.. I made a yahoo group for everyone to add on.
:)
it is
Adduecon230.

find the email add as:
adduecon230@yahoo.com

if you don't have a yahoo account, need not to worry...
Feel free to comment on this note and send me your email add, that way I can respond to you
as soon as I can.

For other reference, I can also share through gmail since i have already posted this is my gmail documents ready for share. :)
For other questions and queries, feel free to ask me and I'll get back to you as soon as possible.
I have already posted 4 notes as given by Sir James.

God bless guys. Study hard! Break a leg!

Thursday, April 14, 2011

Economics Homework: Race to Oil Price Hike

Gov’t gains P1.2B from high oil prices 

2-month windfall to finance subsidy program
By Ronnel Domingo
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 20:24:00 04/13/2011

Filed Under: Oil & Gas - Downstream activities, Earnings,State Budget & Taxes, Government
MANILA, Philippines—The Aquino administration enjoyed a windfall of some P1.2 billion in January and February from surging prices of oil imports, Finance Undersecretary Gil S. Beltran said.
Beltran said in an interview that the unexpected gain came from collections of value-added tax on petroleumproducts, the prices of which were pegged at about $89 a barrel in the first two months of the year.
Tax collections rise along with world oil prices since the higher the price, the higher the proportionate and corresponding value of the 12-percent VAT.
Citing preliminary figures, Beltran said that P500 million of the total windfall was registered in January alone.
“Around P700 million was collected in February but this figure is not yet final,” he said, adding that the windfall probably continued in March along with the sustained increase in international oil prices.
Last Tuesday, oil companies jacked up pump prices of gasoline and diesel by P1.50 to P1.75 a liter.
This was the 12th time that prices increased since the start of 2011, bringing to P9.60 and P9.85 the cumulative increases per liter of gasoline and diesel, respectively.
The Department of Finance (DoF) recommended that the VAT on petroleum products be collected as usual despite calls for its removal as prices shoot up due to tensions in the Middle East.
Based on a DoF document, the department said removing the tax or putting a cap on it was ill-advised considering that VAT on oil amounted to P47 billion in 2010, representing 12.5 percent of total VAT collections for the year and 4.3 percent of total tax revenues.
“Removal of the VAT on oil will cause major dislocation in the finances of the government,” the DoF said.
“A cap on VAT on oil will also render revenue programming uncertain since it will be made hostage to the movement in oil prices,” the agency added.
For 2011 when the government expects to spend P300 billion over the budget, MalacaƱang hopes to raise a total of P1.41 trillion in revenues.
The DoF said the abolition of the VAT on oil was also bound to benefit the rich more than the poor because petroleum products were consumed directly more by those in the middle- and high-income economic groups.

-----------------------------------------------------



Personal reaction:

We all know that petroleum industry holds most of the primer ladder in economics. The world consumes 30 billion barrels (4.8 km³) of oil per year, with developed nations being the largest consumers. With the oil price hike, economists would also opt to change the prices of other goods and commodities sold in the market.
The high oil prices played a critical role in substantially reducing economic growth in most of these cases. But let us not put all the blame to the increasing price of oil in the global market. In this article, the variable of the case goes solely to the major setbacks in tax rates supplemented to petroleum. I believe the author is right. With the staggering oil price increase and a decrease in tax for petroleum products, a slight change would be seen by other people which is mostly from the middle to the high class society. Prices of commodities would be the same, which is high for that matter. The people more affected are those in the average and poverty level. 


Consider this:
Middle to High Class: they can afford cars(those who consume more on petrol) meaning they have stable jobs, they  have businesses, they can afford loans, they have houses, they can pay rent. Although they spent a lot on petroleum, they also have a source of income.
Low to Poverty Level: they don't have cars (so this does not affect them much), however, if oil prices increases, so would the other commodities. These people don't have a stable jobs, they can be manual laborers, low paid workers and limited budget workers like sales ladies in the supermarket. Imagine, if they have 6,000/month salary, the budget goes to food, for family consumption, light and water bills, some for rent, to pay other dues. Let us consider the fact that we are living in a world that everything has a price to pay.


So, Removal of the VAT on oil will cause major dislocation in the finances of the government , TRUE. The allocation of other levels in the pie would be disturbed. Maybe the only reason for such removal is because the government themselves are major consumers in the market for oil.
Statement two, A cap on VAT on oil will also render revenue programming uncertain since it will be made hostage to the movement in oil prices, then again I agree. There would be major setbacks in the allocation of tax rates to other areas. There would again be issues concerning where to allocate the tax apprehended from petroleum that was removed, and that we all know that petroleum tax has the highest effect according to empirical studies.
As as I have pointed earlier, we have to look for solutions to problems that can remove the escalating poverty levels in the Philippines. They scarcity of resources should not be blamed but the efficiency of the government who handles the decision making in the market. They should think out of the box, better yet, they should put themselves in the shoes of the poor.


-beth-